
Class I Device Manufacturers
Know which exemptions really apply to your Class I device, and keep the records that still do.
Learn more: Class I Device ManufacturersAudit readiness for US medical device manufacturers
QMSAdvisor turns the quality documents you already have into a clear audit-readiness plan. AI does the first-pass heavy lifting. A qualified QMS advisor reviews, decides and approves every finding.

The Problem
Most quality teams don't lack procedures. They lack time to read hundreds of documents against the requirements, find the gaps and the contradictions, and show an investigator a clean line from requirement to record. That work usually lands on the same few people who run the quality system day to day.
Complaint files do not record the MDR reportability decision
What to submit
How It Works
AI handles the first pass. People handle every decision. Your team always knows what to do next and why.
Upload the quality documents you already have: procedures, records, spreadsheets and exports from your current eQMS. Nothing is migrated or rewritten. Original files are preserved and fingerprinted.
AI-assisted gap analysis reads every document against QMSR, ISO 13485 and the standards in scope, and drafts candidate gaps. Each one points to the document and passage it came from.
A qualified QMS advisor reviews every draft, discards what doesn't hold up, adds what software can't judge and sets severity. Nothing reaches you until the advisor publishes it.
Advisor-reviewed findings, each with the requirement, the source, a severity, a gap type and a plain checklist of what to submit to close it.
Findings become a working plan with owners, due dates and evidence requirements, sorted so the riskiest gaps are handled first.
Your team submits evidence against each finding: a revised procedure, a training record, a completed validation. A resubmission has to say what changed.
The advisor accepts the evidence or returns it with a note. Every decision is written to an activity history that can't be edited after the fact.
A readiness view by area, a rehearsal in the inspection simulator, and a record that shows an auditor exactly how each gap was found and closed.
The dashed label marks the only step software does on its own. Every step after it runs through a person.
Services
Start with a gap assessment, prepare for a specific audit or inspection, respond to a 483, or keep your system ready year-round.
We usually recommend starting with an AI-assisted QMS gap assessment. An advisor will tell you if something else fits better.
Audits and Inspections
What each audit or inspection is, who runs it, what triggers it and what gets examined. Since February 2, 2026, FDA inspects device makers under QMSR and Compliance Program 7382.850.
Who We Serve
From Class I to Class III, from gloves and dressings to hospital beds and imaging systems, and from manufacturers to distributors, relabelers and reprocessors. Medical only.

Know which exemptions really apply to your Class I device, and keep the records that still do.
Learn more: Class I Device Manufacturers
For 510(k) and De Novo device makers whose design, change and risk records need to agree with each other.
Learn more: Class II Device Manufacturers
For PMA applicants and holders facing pre-approval inspections, supplements and postmarket obligations.
Learn more: Class III Device Manufacturers
For software device teams: lifecycle records, cybersecurity, release control and AI model management.
Learn more: Software as a Medical Device and AI-Enabled Devices
For IVD makers balancing analytical claims, stability evidence, specimen studies and the EU IVDR.
Learn more: In Vitro Diagnostics
For drug-device and biologic-device combinations working across two sets of quality requirements at once.
Learn more: Combination Products
For devices that stay in the body: long-term biocompatibility, unit traceability and patient records.
Learn more: Implantable Devices
For sterile disposables: sterilization validation, bioburden, cleanrooms and packaging that holds its claims.
Learn more: Sterile Single-Use Devices
For powered and capital equipment: electrical safety, usability, installation and service records.
Learn more: Electromedical and Capital Equipment
For orthopedic implant and instrument makers: machining, cleaning, instrument reprocessing and deep catalogs.
Learn more: Orthopedic Devices
For catheter, valve and cardiac rhythm device makers working under close clinical and postmarket scrutiny.
Learn more: Cardiovascular Devices
For imaging system and image software makers managing installed bases, software updates and cybersecurity.
Learn more: Diagnostic Imaging
For dental device and material makers: reusable instruments, digital workflows and dealer channels.
Learn more: Dental Devices
For contact lens, intraocular and ophthalmic instrument makers with tight optical and residue controls.
Learn more: Ophthalmic Devices
For connected health hardware and app makers where claims, firmware updates and consumer supply chains meet.
Learn more: Wearables and Digital Health
For contract manufacturers and component suppliers answering to many customers' audits and agreements.
Learn more: Contract Manufacturers and Component Suppliers
For first-time device companies building a QMS in phases, starting with design controls and submissions.
Learn more: Startups and First-Time Submitters
For US manufacturers adding MDSAP, EU MDR or IVDR, or ISO 13485 certification to an FDA-focused QMS.
Learn more: Established Manufacturers Expanding to New Markets
For makers of gloves, dressings, syringes, tubing, kits and other high-volume medical supplies.
Learn more: Medical Supply Manufacturers
For hospital beds, mobility aids, patient lifts, respiratory equipment and other devices used at home.
Learn more: Durable Medical and Home-Use Equipment
For distributors, initial importers and private-label distributors with complaint, reporting and traceability duties.
Learn more: Distributors and Importers
For firms that relabel, repackage or assemble devices into convenience kits and procedure packs.
Learn more: Relabelers, Repackagers and Kit Assemblers
For single-use device reprocessors, remanufacturers, refurbishers, servicers and OEMs writing reprocessing instructions.
Learn more: Reprocessors, Refurbishers and Servicers
For firms that design and own a device but have it made by a contract manufacturer.
Learn more: Specification DevelopersStandards and Regulations
The AI first pass and the advisor review work against QMSR, ISO 13485 and the standards and regulations that apply to your devices. Plain-language guides to each are free to read.
Why Advisor-Reviewed AI
AI is good at reading everything. It isn't accountable for a judgment call. QMSAdvisor puts each to work where it belongs.
| Capability | Software-only AI analysis | Traditional consulting | QMSAdvisor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reads every document | Yes | Samples, as time allows | Yes, in the AI first pass |
| Decides what is a real gap | Your own team | The consultant | A qualified advisor reviews every finding |
| Shows the source of each finding | Depends on the tool | Depends on the consultant | Document and passage on every finding |
| Requires moving your QMS | Often | No | No |
| Independent acceptance of your evidence | No | Informal, by email | Advisor accepts or returns, with a recorded reason |
| Record of how each gap was closed | Depends on the tool | Spread across email and files | Activity history that can't be edited |
| Inspection rehearsal | Rarely | In person, if booked | FDA Inspection Simulator |
General comparison of approaches, not of any specific product or firm.
Questions
About the service, the platform, AI, inspections and how engagements work.
No. We work from the documents you already have, in whatever form they are in: files on a shared drive, spreadsheets, or exports from the eQMS you use today. Your system of record stays where it is.
No. AI takes on the slow part, reading hundreds of documents and cross-checking them. The judgment calls, such as whether something is a real gap, how serious it is and whether your evidence closes it, are made by a qualified advisor.
Since February 2, 2026, FDA inspects device manufacturers under the Quality Management System Regulation and Compliance Program 7382.850, which replaced the QSIT approach. Requirements are grouped into six QMS areas plus four other FDA requirements, and inspections are risk-based, starting from your risk management documentation.
FDA asks for a written response within 15 business days after the inspection closes for the response to be considered before further action. The platform tracks that countdown from the day you enter the close date.
No, and no one honestly can. Outcomes are decided by FDA investigators, notified bodies and certification bodies. What we can do is find your gaps early, help you close them with evidence that stands up, and rehearse the inspection so your team is prepared.
Engagements are scoped after an assessment call, because the work depends on your devices, the size of your quality system and the audit or inspection ahead. You'll get a written scope before any work starts.
Request an Assessment
Tell us about your devices, your documents and the audit or inspection ahead. An advisor will follow up to scope an assessment. Please don't send confidential documents yet: secure upload is set up after onboarding.


